It can nevertheless be noted that a farmer’s agricultural profits Simplified transition are not equivalent to a salary in terms of the availability of income for consumption and saving. Indeed? as a self-employed worker? farmers can integrate part of their consumption expenses directly into their farm accounts (energy or housing expenses for example if they are not Simplified transition separable from their agricultural activity)? and therefore deduct them from their agricultural profits as expenses. Furthermore? agricultural profits remain an accounting and tax construct and do not reflect a level of cash actually available.
But symmetrically? the “available balance” at the farm level (see above ) does not only constitute income directly usable for consumption? because it is also a way for the farmer to finance his investments in the renewal of the farm’s assets (new machines? new buildings or major renovation work for example)? this income/investment arbitrage being carried out over a horizon that is not limited to the year (depending on the results of the year? the cycle of past investments? economic and financial conditions and prospects? etc.).
Living standards and poverty in agricultural households
The standard of living of a household divides its malaysia phone number library disposable income by the number of household consumption units ? a function of its size? so as to make the incomes of households demand for artificial intelligence chips of different sizes or compositions comparable.
In 2020? the median standard of living of people living in a farming household (i.e. a household to which a farmer belongs) is close to that of the population as a whole: €22?400 for the entire population? compared to €22?800 for people living in a farming household (Givois? 2024).
However? income dispersion is higher within
Farming households than in the agb directory population as a whole. This is true at the bottom of the distribution with a standard of living within farming households that is more frequently.