Google Search Quality Rater’s Guidelines: a 2021 Updated Version!

We present to you the data of our business consumer phone list. We have the world’s best quality database, which is very valuable for marketing your business. You can visit our B2C phone database, We sell the world’s last top B2C phone database. You can take any database from us to fix any problem. You can buy the lowest price data in a very simple way than anyone else here, We’ll help you find the decision-making phone data in your email porch.So check our B2C phone data without delay.

Google Search Quality Rater’s Guidelines: a 2021 Updated Version!

Quality Rater’s Guidelines The latest version was released on October 14. 2020 with a few key changes and additions. Here is a summary of what to remember and still be valid in 2021. Google Search Rater’s Guidelines: what are they The Google Search Rater’s Guidelines are a guide given by . Google to those men and women who rate the relevance and quality of search results on behalf of the search engine. Hired by third-party companies on behalf of Google, these Raters are responsible, after analysis, for evaluating. The quality of the search results provided by Google on certain queries as well as the quality of the pages that come up first on these search results.

Quality Evaluator’s Guidelines , a 166-page support freely accessible to all full of good information when ‘we are a webmaster or web professional who is interested in SEO. Search Quality Rater’s Guidelines 2021: what are the latest changes? If you’re expecting major changes, you’re going to be disappointed. However, combined, they all deserved a full document update according to Google lead company algeria  so they still have significant importance to the search engine. Here is a summary of what has evolved/changed: The concept of “EAT” (Expertise, Authoritativeness.  Interstitials that follow (or not) the scroll of a user on mobile and invite him to download the application with few means offered to escape it are considered a poor quality experience by Google:

Previously, Google Considered This Practice as Bad Only If It

Was a popover with an ad that was difficult to close (see section 6.4). The expertise of a content creator assessed beyond textual content by Search Quality Raters. Google now invites them to analyze the photos and videos produced by this content creator when he demonstrates his expertise (the example is given in the context of a DIY site for example) (see section 11.0). If a page does not add value or useful information to the query, even if the site is of excellent quality and looks serious .  Search Quality Raters will now assess the relevance and quality of the results offered for voice searches.

Algeria-B2B-Contact-List Email List

Summary, these are sites that can potentially negatively impact the life and money of.  Internet users  presented with poor results  is particularly demanding all.  Sites and pages who have a means of payment which deal with subjects related to the laws which deal with topics on drugs and health which provide information on finance and banking. Google for Search Quality Raters, these men and women who evaluate the quality of websites . And the results returned by the Google search engine on certain queries. Google had so far only made such a document public in 2013 . Intended solely for its search results evaluators  the  Search Quality Raters Google has . Just published the 2015 version of

Summary : Warning: Search Quality Guidelines Have Nothing

The Google search quality guidelines are very interesting to study to understand. What Google considers to be a quality site, an authority site. However, these guidelines are not an exhaustive list of positioning factors on Google . Thus, the fact of having made public this guide of more than 160 pages can . Help you to understand certain SEO elements but it will especially help you to understand how to improve the quality of . Your website in the eyes of Google and in the eyes of Search Quality Raters.  To rate the quality of websites and the quality of search results returned by the Mountain View search engine.

Among the interesting elements that emerge from this document. The notion of Main Content and Supplementary Content are two notions that you should absolutely study. Or in elements of the site that come up in many places. What is also very interesting to study in this document is the set of examples. Presented by Google as pages of very good quality and those of lower quality. These numerous examples are perfect for concretely illustrating . What are the most interesting elements of these Search Quality Guidelines to study?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *